GREEN BUILDING IN ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • M.M. Danyliuk West Ukrainian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk Educational and Scientific Institute of Management, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Administration, vul. Dnistrovska, 32, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76000
  • M.V. Dmytryshyn West Ukrainian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk Educational and Scientific Institute of Management, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Administration, vul. Dnistrovska, 32, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.1.16.153-162

Keywords:

green economy, green building, certification

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify the key characteristics of green building that are necessary for the possible benefits and prospects.

Research methods used in the article - comparison, analogy, induction and deduction, systems analysis and systems approach.

Results. The article reveals the key characteristics, needs and prerequisites for the existence of green building. The difference between traditional and green construction is revealed. The place of green construction as a part of green economy is characterized. The factors by which green construction objects affect the environment and public health are singled out; they are also structured in a logical sequence of appearance. Green certification systems have been studied. The LEED standard, which is used in the construction of new and renovation projects; interior reconstruction and decoration of buildings in operation; residential real estate; suburban housing and cottage settlements, is characterized. The BREEAM standard is similarly described as one of the most well-known and widespread methods of assessing the environmental performance of buildings (office centers, shopping malls, industrial facilities, secondary schools, apartment buildings, courts and prisons, available housing). The indicators of the standards (place to build, water and energy efficiency, consumption of materials and resources, environmental quality, innovation, management, health, transport, waste disposal, pollution) are evaluated and their rating in the scoring system is fixed. Factors for increasing the investment attractiveness of green construction projects have been identified. A schematic model of increasing the investment attractiveness of green construction through taking into account the factors of influence (uniqueness, quality, responsibility) and benefits (reducing costs and increasing opportunities) has been developed and described. The benefits of green building for four actors: region, investors, construction companies and owners of «green» buildings are outlined.

Scientific originality. The result of the publication is the construction of a holistic description of green building, starting from the preconditions and needs of its existence, and ending with the benefits and prospects.

The practical significance of the results. The results are properly described and graphically represented; this allows them to be used in the process of further scientific research, practical activities and to replenish the intellectual capital of all interested readers.

Author Biographies

M.M. Danyliuk , West Ukrainian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk Educational and Scientific Institute of Management, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Administration, vul. Dnistrovska, 32, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76000

Ph.D (Econ.)

M.V. Dmytryshyn , West Ukrainian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk Educational and Scientific Institute of Management, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Administration, vul. Dnistrovska, 32, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76000

Ph.D (Econ.),  associate professor

References

1. Mashchenko, S.O., Vovk, M.S, and R.A. Aliyev. “Theory and methodology of “green building” .” Economic space,no.113, 2016, pp. 220-230.
2. Orlovska, Y.V., Vovk, M.S., Chala, V.S., and S.O Mashchenko. EU economic policy to support green housing: Monograph. Dnipro, 2017.
3. Sarkisian, L.H. “Investing in green building as a means of stimulating regional development.” Development of productive forces and regional economy, Issue 6 (11), 2017, pp. 243-246.
4. Protasenko, O.F., and G.V.Migal. “Ecological and ergonomic design as a component of green construction.” Environmental sciences, no 1 (28), 2019, pp. 302-306.
5. Orlovska, Y.V. “Green building - a way to sustainable development of urban ecosystems based on EU experience.” Economic space, no. 120, 2017, pp. 216–223.
6. Bilyk, O.A. “Green building: concept, causes and trends.” Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Ser .: Economic Sciences, vol. 20 (1), 2016, pp. 53-57.
7. Doroshenko, V.M. “Theoretical and methodological approaches to defining the concept of “green building”.” Current problems of economic development of the region, vol. 14 (2), 2018, pp. 31-38.
8. Bondar O.I., editor. “Green” economy as a basis for greening local development: Monograph. Kherson, OLDI-PLUS, 2018. 2
9. Borovik, Yu.T., Yelagin, Yu.V., and O.M. Polyakova ““Green economy”: essence, principles, prospects for Ukraine.” Bulletin of Transport Economics and Industry, no. 69, 2020, pp. 75–83.
10. Dobrovolska, O. “Green economy: theory and practice of implementation in Ukraine.” Socio-economic problems and the state, vol. 1, 2018, pp. 196-205.
11. Bondar, N.O., and I.V.Todrina. “Green economy” in the tourism industry: problems and prospects for development in the context of the impact on the economic condition of local communities.” Bulletin of the Petro Vasylenko Kharkiv National Technical University of Agriculture, vol. 202, 2019, pp. 92-100.
12. Krasnikova, N.O., Khokhlova, A.V., and P.D. Krasnikov. “Green economy” as an element of sustainable development: current status and prospects.” Economic Bulletin of the Zaporozhye State Engineering Academy, vol. 5, 2018, pp. 19-23.
13. Tarasenko, D.L. “Sustainable development and «green» economy: EU policy.” Bulletin of the Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, no. 10, 2017, pp. 111–115.
14. Hura, A.A., and T.G.Hutsan. “Green economy: essence, factors and prospects of development in Ukraine.” Collection of scientific works of Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after G.S. Skovoroda. Economy, vol. 17, 2017, pp. 42-52.
15. Danyliuk, M.M., and M.V. Dmytryshyn. “Municipal property management.” Economy. Finances. Law, no.6. 2020, pp. 11-13.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-25

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 16 (2020): THE ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF REGIONAL ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT

Section

Regional policy

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)